<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEC Emergency Order Extended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investingadventures.com/2008/07/sec-emergency-order-extended.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investingadventures.com/2008/07/sec-emergency-order-extended.html</link>
	<description>Having Fun with Options</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:39:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Options Strategery</title>
		<link>http://investingadventures.com/2008/07/sec-emergency-order-extended.html/comment-page-1#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Options Strategery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingadventures.com/?p=520#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>Naked shorting without intent to borrow has always been illegal.  They should clarify the rules and remove things like &#039;intent&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naked shorting without intent to borrow has always been illegal.  They should clarify the rules and remove things like &#8216;intent&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ling</title>
		<link>http://investingadventures.com/2008/07/sec-emergency-order-extended.html/comment-page-1#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingadventures.com/?p=520#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re stating clearly that it won&#039;t be extended beyond Aug 12. Why would they do that? Kinda like cops announcing they won&#039;t be on the streets after midnight... And what the rulemaking part? I mean, does the SEC intend to come out with some kind of a permanent rule barring naked shorts against institutions which are borrowing from the Fed&#039;s emergency window?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re stating clearly that it won&#8217;t be extended beyond Aug 12. Why would they do that? Kinda like cops announcing they won&#8217;t be on the streets after midnight&#8230; And what the rulemaking part? I mean, does the SEC intend to come out with some kind of a permanent rule barring naked shorts against institutions which are borrowing from the Fed&#8217;s emergency window?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
